Jump to content

It's not your imagination


Aptos Driver
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Toyota Prius C is EPA rated at 53 MPG in the city. Consumer Reports' review says they got 37 MPG city in the Prius C. That's a 16 MPG deficit. CR's report from last week was critical of the C Max's "real world" mileage. In it they the say "The largest discrepancy we've previously seen was 7 and 6 MPG for the Toyota Prius C...".

 

So, their report on the Prius C says it performed 16 MPG below its EPA city rating, while this new report says only 7 MPG lower.

 

Which is it?

Consumer Reports used combined mpg as the comparison number while failing to address the Prius C much larger city discrepancy.

 

Consumer Reports in the interest of fair reporting should have expanded the numbers to include the largest city and highway discrepancy by Brand/Model but chose the path of paid advertising media to report only what made the C-Max look the worst.

 

 

Edited by darrelld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...