CNCGeek

It was nice finding this thread, it reminded me to remove the sticker. Gonna try the dental floss trick I saw somewhere - just use it to remove the sticker, and then see if wd40 will take the residue off.

Thanks, I hope that is the case, however this is not something I can duplicate yet. Update - nope, they cannot duplicate it, so they cannot check it (I cannot duplicate it either, so hard to argue with that logic). I did not push this beyond the SA since I feel that sooner of later Ford is gonna expand the recall if they find more seats outside the recall scope that have provable problems, and are fixed under warranty. I get these safety related recalls done ASAP, and I don't like waiting for something like this to break, but I tried. I doubt that anyone who gets this recall (and has the seat frame replaced) will be shown the part they pulled, but it would be interesting to know if that happens, what the problem "looked" like.

Sorry I should have clarified, the VIN was not in the computer as being part of the recall. I am waiting for the service advisor to check if they will still check the seats though.

Thanks Bill and Paul. Thats bad news for me since I cannot duplicate the noise. I think I am going to request that the dealer take a look at the seat when I take it in for the other recalls, but only if they will cover it under the warranty. Even though my vehicle was built near the beginning of the recall period, it seems unlikely the seats will get checked under the recall based on an initial discussion with the dealer (service advisor is going to check). I called the Ford 800 number, and they were nice, but not much help. Basically if the VIN is not in the computer, they probably won't look at it under the recall.

My C-max was an August 2012 build, and I did not get the recall notice, but this has me a bit concerned. Based on this, I don't get a warm feeling that they can be certain they have all the VIN's covered. I recall feeling a pop/clunk in the driver seat several times since I purchased it, but I wouldn't be able to reproduce it (thats what raised my suspicion regarding this recall and my vehicle). For folks who have had the problem, was it noticeable, or did you ever have a reason to suspect a problem?

I'm not sure about the validity of this, but I read on the Internets that (some?) tire shops will not repair a tire that has been plugged with the cord type plug kits. Probably a mix of liability and selling another tire. I still carry one though since it provides an option. I also bought a spare from a Focus IIRC, and a jack from Harbor Freight, for longer trips.

Hi Bro, I can't speak for the mpg hit, but they are quiet and I have never really noted much noise from the aeroblades.

Thanks Frank, although it is hard to disagree with the EPA (ahem...47mpg), I think I will still drop the $10 to swap the filter when I think it is dirty. In another car I would just check it, maybe vaccum it out and call it good - as you said, if I can see light through it. However with the C-max, they make it so difficult to swap the filter, it is not really worth checking - just swap it and move on. On point 2, I agree that filters get more "efficient" at trapping stuff, but they are also getting less efficient at allowing air to move through (more work required to move the same volume of air though the filter). It may also be the case that a generalization of a handful of cars (1972-2007 models) is not going to apply "apples to apples" to our Hybrids with small 2.0L engines and tiny filters. Since I live in a dusty region, I will still stick with 15-20k intervals on the filter, possibly less depending on the number of dusty storms the car is subjected to.

I replaced my CAF and engine air filter today (less than 15k miles). The car was driven through several big dust storms in the mid-west so I did not want to take the chance. The CAF looked really bad, the engine filter looked OK, but dusty. On another car I would have vacuumed it out and put it back, but since it is not a simple job to swap it, I dropped a new FRAM in there. The filter area is pretty small also, but so is the engine. They certainly did not make it easy to swap the filter (remove 2 hoses, 2 bolts on the engine cover, remove the MAF connector, PCV valve and clip, wrest the engine cover out, then 5 bolts on the air filter cover - and the put all that suff back). I especially did not like that the MAF connector has to be removed each time, that is asking for trouble in the long run. 30k miles may be pushing it if you live in a place with dust, I think every 20k may be closer to ideal.

I got mine jack!

This is interesting, but makes sense for normal tires. Spares are normally stored inside the vehicle so that may help with mitigating some of the factors that degrade the rubber, though certainly not the ideal conditions they mentioned. The big problem I see is that you can't really find any place that sells a replacement (new) spare, in a lot of cases, so seems to be a catch 22.

I just picked up a scissors jack from HF, and had to go through 5 of them before I found one that did not have a bent screw. Not sure why they had so many that were messed up (they did not appear to be used). I'd suggest checking it out first - should be able to turn the screw by hand without too much trouble, if not it is probably bent. There is a 25% off coupon out there right now. Also picked up one of these. I went for the 2012 focus spare since it is newer rubber and may last longer (I don't know how well spares last over the years).

Any update on this - got some pics?

Hi Reedmother, thanks for sharing the extra info on the problem. Did they replace hardware or just re-program the computer? Did you see anything related to a body control module "BCM" or powertrain control module "PCM" in the gibberish which they provided on the printout? I also found a TSB which sounds like a possibility - it would be listed in the printout if they related it ( TSB 13-4-22 - for c-max vehicles built on or before 4/9/2013 ) - I found that in this post. When my battery died, everything was dead so it makes sense it was the computer (since yours would not start, but otherwise could turn on). I'm sure they tested your 12v battery when you had it in so if they did not replace it, it is probably fine.

Thats good news. I am going in next week to get the recalls taken care of and the system update programmed. So far though, the car's hesitancy to go into reverse has been an almost daily occurrence.