Seth7721 Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 (edited) Fuellys MPG went up by 0.1 mpg!!! the best part is the number of people with 39 mpg went down and the number of people with 40 mpg went up!!!!!!!!!!!! This is clearly showing that, as the weather gets warmer the C-max mpg goes up. I took the first photos on 5-3-2013 and the second on 5-5-2013. The photos have date and time in the right bottom corner. Edited May 5, 2013 by Seth7721 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RachelnLa Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 I thinking the same thing about the graft changing when the weather warmed. Thanks for posting! Seth7721 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adair Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Thanks for the pix Seth!! I thought it was changing too! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roninsd Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 With my last fillup, my average (since I came onto fuelly.com) finally got up the 40 mark. 42 on my lifetime mpg display. Little by little! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salsaguy Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 (edited) only problem is that as cmax gets more popular, new owners like us will add to the fuelly stats and initail breakin data shows LOWER mpg so it may go back down unless current owners mpg outweigh new owners mpg average. with AVERAGE being used instead of MEDIAN, all data is skewed by the extreme low mpgs and high mpgs. i wonder if any one has taken/ downloaded all data points from fuelly and done the median mpg to see the difference.even one low mpg will skew average mpg whereas on median it wont if i have the time i can do it data/statistics are part of my job/career being a Quality Assurance Engineer ;) Edited May 6, 2013 by salsaguy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adair Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 only problem is that as cmax gets more popular, new owners like us will add to the fuelly stats and initail breakin data shows LOWER mpg so it may go back down unless current owners mpg outweigh new owners mpg average. with AVERAGE being used instead of MEDIAN, all data is skewed by the extreme low mpgs and high mpgs. i wonder if any one has taken/ downloaded all data points from fuelly and done the median mpg to see the difference.even one low mpg will skew average mpg whereas on median it wont if i have the time i can do it data/statistics are part of my job/career being a Quality Assurance Engineer ;)Hi SalsaGuy, One advantage the new buyers have now is not competing with winter temps. :yahoo: Up to this point, maybe a month ago, anyone in the Northeast, Midwest, who bought a C-MAX not only had to deal with the learning curve that comes with driving a hybrid, but with sub-feeeeezing and many times sub-zero temps for the first 5-6 months of ownership. Not a problem for the next 4 or so months. :dogwalk: Also, any new buyers who found the forum while waiting for their car will have the advantage of all the knowledge and experience all the early adopters have shared. :rockon: It would be interesting to see the difference between the average and the median tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salsaguy Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 have to also worry about the losers at fuelly who created bogus accounts to fudge/ruin the cmax mpg numbers lower on purpose !! :rant: :rant:median would help with those for suretaking out the highest and lowest values in a data set are also common techniques to minimize skewed data Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth7721 Posted May 6, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 (edited) have to also worry about the losers at fuelly who created bogus accounts to fudge/ruin the cmax mpg numbers lower on purpose !! :rant: :rant:median would help with those for suretaking out the highest and lowest values in a data set are also common techniques to minimize skewed dataYou are 100% right. Fuelly should require you to put in your vin# or something else to prove you own the vehicle you are reporting on. I hate the fact that some people try to ruin other vehicles reputation. Are they really that afraid Ford is going steal all of Toyota Prii sales? Oh, wait yes they are. Ford has taken 12% market share from Toyota since last year. Ford has 18% and growing and Toyota still has a whopping 58%, but that numbers goes down monthly. (Last year at the beginning of March Toyota had 71% of the hybrid market.) Edited May 6, 2013 by Seth7721 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKG85 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 I'm in the Northeast and have definitely seen MPG improving with warmer weather. Even before it got warm, after about 5K miles the MPG began to improve. I frequently get between 45 and 50 on jaunts around town, and around 45 on the highway. What kills the fuel economy is short trips on a cold engine. Basic stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salsaguy Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 (edited) i pulled the data from the feuleconomy.gov site today and started the analysis and will contine with fuelly. we have more data fields to play with on fuelly to see any correlations but there are definite loser data in there. you can tell by the names used. i may remove those from the analysis. on fueleconomy we dont have the details and names so we can't tell as much. im going to try to pull avg temps for each state for 2012 to determine (prove) the colder states do indeed get lower mpg. when im done i can share the excel file on the files site (box.net or other) for those that want details and post the summary here for those that dont Edited May 7, 2013 by salsaguy zhackwyatt 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roninsd Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Thanks, Salsa. Would be intereting to see the results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riddley Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 i pulled the data from the feuleconomy.gov site today and started the analysis and will contine with fuelly. we have more data fields to play with on fuelly to see any correlations but there are definite loser data in there. you can tell by the names used. i may remove those from the analysis. on fueleconomy we dont have the details and names so we can't tell as much. im going to try to pull avg temps for each state for 2012 to determine (prove) the colder states do indeed get lower mpg. when im done i can share the excel file on the files site (box.net or other) for those that want details and post the summary here for those that don't That would be excellent to see Salesguy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth7721 Posted May 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2013 I JUST CHECKED FUELLY.COM AND THE AVERAGE MPG HIT 39!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jus-A-CMax Posted May 11, 2013 Report Share Posted May 11, 2013 (edited) ...also, the members in the 600 CMax club has also gone up, 3 recently and fuelly doesn't include some big number members like Recumpence. Yeah, as I have been saying those Fuelly numbers will shift right. Keep going, let all other doubters eat their words ;) Edited May 11, 2013 by Jus-A-CMax Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adair Posted May 12, 2013 Report Share Posted May 12, 2013 Well, I'm trying to do my part. I filled up yesterday (I know, I caved at 500, but not out of fear, out of necessity. Today's activities didn't lend themselves to obsessively watching the M to E or gallons used while trying to carry on conversations with fam and friends in the car. ) M to E said I still had 59, so I know I could have done more. Anyhoo, this tank average was 45.4 mpg!!!! Not too shabby, I'd say. :wub2: This next week looks pretty normal, so maybe I'll stretch it a bit. :sing_rain: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotomoto Posted May 25, 2013 Report Share Posted May 25, 2013 I JUST CHECKED FUELLY.COM AND THE AVERAGE MPG HIT 39!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: 39.1 Today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth7721 Posted May 25, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2013 39.1 Today Just keep rising just keep rising. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotomoto Posted May 26, 2013 Report Share Posted May 26, 2013 Another tenth overnight: 39.2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth7721 Posted May 26, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2013 Another tenth overnight: 39.2I saw that!!!!!!!!!!!!. I also saw that more people are getting 40mpg than anything else!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seth7721 Posted May 26, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 26, 2013 Also 73 people are getting 30-39 mpg. 96 are getting 40+ mpg. In your face Consumer Reports. Jus-A-CMax 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adair Posted June 4, 2013 Report Share Posted June 4, 2013 39.2 now!!! Yiiipppeee!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jus-A-CMax Posted June 4, 2013 Report Share Posted June 4, 2013 Also 73 people are getting 30-39 mpg. 96 are getting 40+ mpg. In your face Consumer Reports.Me like that, very Homer Simpson :rockon: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fotomoto Posted June 4, 2013 Report Share Posted June 4, 2013 39.2 now!!! Yiiipppeee!!! Correction: 39.3 With better mileage comes longer tanks. I bet fuelly lags a month or more behind and we'll see it continuing to increase even when winter hits for those of you who have winters. (ducks and runs) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adair Posted June 4, 2013 Report Share Posted June 4, 2013 Correction: 39.3 With better mileage comes longer tanks. I bet fuelly lags a month or more behind and we'll see it continuing to increase even when winter hits for those of you who have winters. (ducks and runs)WOW, it flipped up .1 while we were talking about it! Cool! (be glad you ducked and ran!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wab Posted June 4, 2013 Report Share Posted June 4, 2013 (edited) I just noticed that 16 of the total 212 C-Max are not hybrid and most of those are diesel. Could one of the Fuelly members get these 16 United Kingdom cars moved to the UK tab? Edited June 4, 2013 by wab Noah Harbinger 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.