Noah Harbinger

I bundled the first couple recalls, the fuel economy reprogramming, and the sync upgrade all in with my first oil change; and I'm bundling the next 3 recalls with my next oil change (this week hopefully). So I have not had too many trips to the dealer myself.

I definitely noticed the difference in turning radius coming from my Elantra. Lots of places where I routinely made simple U turns are now 3-point turns.

I was wondering the same thing... I'm a one-click fueler, no topping-off for me, so it didn't come from there. Usually my pump volumes are 4% higher than screen volume, so I thought I would have still been ever so little under 13.5. For other stats: My regular commute is 9 miles each way, down a 350 foot valley and back out the other side but otherwise pretty flat.I recently switched strategies from "Maximize EV cruise" to "Launch electric, cruise re-gen to maintain high state-of-charge, except when going down long hills", which seems to have helped, but it could beengine break-in (wow I'm at low milage for 2 years in...)the absolutely GORGEOUS weather out here whichdenecessitates ACminimizes engine-on-for-heating timethe alternate route I'm taking to work to avoid horrible congestionI might also be accelerating less as I try the new strategy.No modifications.Some rats left prickly pear fruits (yes, from the 'tree' you se behind my fuelly profile pic) in my engine which I wonder if might be interfering with cooling - I recently picked as much as I could out without figuring out how to unbolt the engine cover, I wonder if that might have helped?

Are we still accepting new members to the 600+ club? Edit: Fuel used according to the pump: 13.782 gallons, for 'actual' fuel economy of 43.6 MPG.

Frankly, the active noise cancellation is one of the systems I would prefer to outright disable. Noise cancellation just makes lesser noises seem louder.

I try to toe 68MPH on the freeway. Not fast, but still hanging in the right two lanes. If you drive 75/80, the fuel economy drops fast - it has a ridiculously high drag coefficient and a large cross-section size, and with drag increasing with cube of speed, it becomes a factor fast. I probably average 42MPG at 68MPH, but my fuel economy dropped to 34MPG at 78MPH. At that point, you do better in a Camry. (Though I may have had a headwind that trip). My gauge also reads optimistic, generally about 4%. I wonder how much of that is evaporative gasses being recirculated to the engine, burned without being injected / counted? I do report the optimistic mileage on Fuelly.

Make sure to come back and tell everyone what the resolution was!

I love the MyFord Touch. I can recognize its foibles, but I still love it. I absolutely hate the screenshots I have seen of the new system, it's ugly as sin.

That is a standard tactic to create a break in traffic so that a road hazard (e.g. something that fell off a truck) can be safely removed.

This came as a complete surprise to me. I've been getting about 45MPG on my day-to-day driving lately (by the gauge, which is about 43MPH after adjusting for the fuel consumption inaccuracy problem), but I think I drive a tad more carefully than the average person and on roads that are pretty favorable to hybrid driving, so I can't say I'm TOO surprised that the rated fuel economy is dropping again.

Just going to throw another image in here, taken from the Laguna Mountains east of San Diego, with some desert mountains in the background.

Well heck, I'm astounded. I haven't done a lot of long trips but the ones I have, have had bad mileage.

That's all well and good but I'd hate to spend the night in the car some remote place because the battery happened to fail in an inconvenient time and place, or perhaps somewhere outside of cell range. But I suppose I rarely leave the car parked for very long periods in such wildernesses.

I feel like right around 9000 miles or so is when I saw the biggest increase in fuel economy. It's probably true that you would get better fuel economy where it is flat than where it is hilly. But the thing is, other cars also get worse fuel economy where it is hilly, and I think the C-Max will perform closer to its rated milage than other cars driving the same route. For example, my friend's Camry gets 15MPG in San Francisco, and I got 32MPG. Our routes are not at all comparable but the type of driving - up-and-down steep hills, constant start and stop, etc - was probably pretty similar. Somewhere flat with long 40MPH stretches without any stopping, yeah I could probably get mid-40s easily, but your average car would probably be doing high 30s. So even though the C-Max would be more fuel efficient on the flats than in a hilly city, it would have a much lower benefit compared to a typical non-hybrid.

That's a good question. The manual says "Do not hang anything (bike rack, etc.) from the spoiler, glass or liftgate. This could damage the liftgate and its components". Maybe someone else has thrown caution in the wind and can report a good or bad result. I fold down my rear seat and put my bike in the back. Take off the front wheel and use the rear wheel to roll the bike as far as it'll go. You'd probably want to put a moving blanket (or something) between two bikes, but I bet you could get them in! The back folds flat so it's great. Someone posted recently about attaching a hitch rack - you might be well advised to read http://fordcmaxhybridforum.com/topic/1422-installing-the-torklift-central-hitch/ if you want to add a rack in a way that doesn't make you worry about damaging the liftgate.

I'm trying to think, how would I objectively test something like the gas pods? MPGs over a test run can vary a lot. The only thing I can think of would be to attach a data logger, put the car in cruise control (non-ECO mode) at a constant speed, and run the same route a couple of times, alternating between pods on and pods off. What I would measure is not MPGs, but one of the engine load, throttle, or accelerator pedal position PIDs, which would seem to be a good measurement of the power the car thinks it needs to maintain a given speed, and are read pretty precisely. That should be pretty identical between runs, and that number should drop measurably if you have made a modification that reduces drag. I'm tempted to try to do it just to see how consistent of a number I could get without making any modifications - if you can't reproduce a result when you aren't making any changes, you have no hope of meaningfully quantifying a small difference when you do make a change. Edit 2: I can't find anything that shows the actual combined load while cruise control is active. Poo

My check got sent back to Ford because I use a PO box and the post office sends back anything that requires a signature after a week or something like that. I sent a message to a customer support form and never received any response back, but Ford did automatically re-send the check - and that time I picked it up without incident. I think my customer support expectations are calibrated lowly enough that I just don't expect any larger organization to respond quickly to individual issues. You need an infinite number of omniscient people, and if any corporation figures out how to do that, they will rule the world. Maybe if call-centers treated those jobs like career tracks instead of like disposable grist, the employees would care enough to engage themselves in building expertise on the subject matter. Fortunately in my case the functioning business process produced the right result. That, in my opinion, is the more important goal anyway.

Sorry for the bad pun, but you hear a creak when you drive over a creek? I used to have a little creak coming continuously from my B-pillar, but it went away when I had the headliner recall done.

It's also a setting users can customize. I know on the mothership, BOF, I disabled signatures because some peoples' were getting ridiculously long.

Is this while drafting behind a semi? I can totally see getting 45MPG if you stick to semi-speeds.

If you know how long the light is, and nobody is pulling in front of you, by braking a little harder earlier, you can often maintain speed so that you don't have to accelerate as much - which is much more efficient than regen and electrical acceleration. I like to stay in Empower most of the time, and switch to Engage if I'm doing any heavy acceleration. I dearly wish you could show the engine power threshold on the Engage display. (Looks like others have commented on #2 already)

Me too, actually! Much harder than any of the other doors (so it can't be air-tightness, or they would be difficult as well). But I almost never have anyone in the back seat.

I think my kick-to-open didn't catch once, since the update.

Now that's thinking ahead! I have the same reaction, and I'll be sure to do the same thing next time!

I know what you mean - there's just something about it that's hard to capture.